The phone number 213-271-2857 is located in or around Los Angeles, CA. This landline number is registered with Verizon Business. There have been 41 searches conducted for this number overall. There are 13 user comments, the latest received on December 31st, 2009 and it has been marked as spam 13 times. This number has a current spam score of 100%. Below you will find additional detailed information:
Threat Detection
Potential SPAM / Scam Caller — Please use caution!
User Score
Spam Score
100% Spam Risk
Why This Number is Risky
This number has been reported as spam 13 times, has been searched 41 times, and has garnered 13 comments by our users. These numbers are higher than average, indicating a possible high risk of spam.
View Spam ReportFind Out Who's Calling
(213) 271-2857
View People Report
Latest User Comments
Leave a CommentGOT PHONE CALL AT 7:45 PM ON 12/30. NO MESSAGE LEFT. JUST ANNOYING! WE ARE ALSO ON THE DO NOT CALL REGISTRY LIST.
Same Here I just tell them the New Number is Number secret service Of my state let them get bothered see what happen last Time I did this was 2 years ago had not got call since. But other day I got a ...If call back A***n were going give them the Number to FBI of My state let them hear FBI then i place their # on my providers Block list !
This number just s****ed calling yes****ay... they leave no message but they call at late hours.. and really early hours...
Calls all hours, leaves no message. If you call the number back, it says, "voice mailbox is full."
213-271-2857 called. We are also on "Do Not Call" list. Asked for family member by name. They had a foreign accent.
Same Same....213 271 2857 Nothing left
Oops, meant to say they left no message.
Same as others here. We did not pick up, they left no answer.
Calls even though our number is on the DO NOT CALL registry
The 213 271 2857 callers are unstoppable, it seems, after all the complaints I've read here. I, of course, don't answer strange calls during telemarket and scammers pre-Christmas blitz. Happens every year. I've turned in the more persistent caller-numbers to the Do Not Call people, but to no avail. On those rare occasions when I confront them, the same thing happens. They either ignore my request to be taken off their list or insult me, as it happened to many. Try to find a way to get back to them and speak to some one who cares, it's as hard as finding bin Ladin. The same as one of the above victims, I work nights, 'til 5 am, and these plague of telemarketers s**** calling sometimes as early as 8 30 am. You'd think with all the technology we have there'd be a way to control this s***.
Just got acll from this number***g up when answering ma****e came onno message left
IT IS A SCAM -BEEN ONGOING - ITS IS REFERENCED HERE IN THIS ARTICLE ON 800NOTESFTC Goes After Credit Card Robocall Scammers 5 hours 20 minutes agoThe Federal Trade Commission just announced its second major law enforcement effort this year targeting telemarketers who violated the Do Not Call Rule and other laws by making ***dreds of thousands or even millions of pre-recorded robocalls to consumers. The cases announced target three groups that allegedly made robocalls to sell worthless credit-card interest-rate reduction programs for hefty up-front fees of as much as $1,495. At the FTC’s request, in each case, the court has issued an order temporarily halting the robocalls pending trial.The three complaints announced today follow two filed in May that led to court orders stopping other telemarketers from using robocalls with deceptive claims about extended auto warranties. According to the FTC complaints, Economic Relief Technologies, LLC, Dynamic Financial Group (U.S.A.) Inc., and JPM Accelerated Services (JPM) and related defendants made illegal pre-recorded robocalls to consumers, using names like “card services,” “credit card services” or “account services.” The robocalls allegedly claimed the defendants’ services could lower the interest rate on consumers’ credit cards. In each case, consumers who pressed 1 after hearing the automated call were transferred to live telemarketers who allegedly misrepresented that consumers could dramatically lower the rates on their credit card. The telemarketers also said consumers would save thousands of dollars in a short period of time by lowering their interest rates and would be able to pay off their debts faster – for an up-front fee ranging from $495 to $1,495. The defendants then falsely stated that if consumers did not save a “guaranteed” amount – typically $2,500 or more – they could get a full refund of the up-front fee. However, after securing the fee, the defendants allegedly did not negotiate lower rates on behalf of consumers and provided few refunds to those who were dissatisfied with the service.The Economic Relief Technologies defendants also allegedly operated a related scam: using names like “Auto Protection Center” and “Warranty Services,” they tricked consumers into believing they were affiliated with their vehicle manufacturer or dealership, and falsely stated that the consumers’ vehicles’ warranties were about to expire. The lawsuits allege the defendants broke the law by making illegal robocalls to consumers, and that their deceptive sales pitches violated the FTC Act and the FTC’s Telemarketing Sales Rule. Additional charges include: 1) calling consumers whose phone numbers are on the National Do Not Call Registry; 2) calling consumers who had previously asked not to be called; 3) failing to transmit their caller ID information, as required; 4) “s****ing” or masking their caller ID information; 5) failing to promptly identify themselves, the purpose of their call, and/or the nature of the goods or services they were selling; 6) improperly abandoning calls; and 7) failing to make required disclosures in their robocalls.
called and left no message. caller ID read California.
Leave a Comment
Related Phone Numbers